Paving Paradise to put up a Parking Lot
by Christina Ramstein
“Don't it always seem to go
That you don't know what you've got
'Till it's gone
They paved paradise
And put up a parking lot”
'Till it's gone
They paved paradise
And put up a parking lot”
“Big Yellow Taxi”, Lyrics and music © by
Joni Mitchell
If
you’ve ever driven in Marina del Rey, you know that much of its boundaries are
either water or wetlands. Many of the wetlands are actually adjacent to major
thoroughfares and intersections, such as Lincoln Blvd., Jefferson Blvd, Culver
Blvd, and even the 90 Marina Expressway. They’re also the borders to a number
of housing projects, including condominiums, homes, and apartments, as well as
strip malls, business complexes, industrial parks and community resources.
Everyone
knows about Playa Vista these days (and if you don’t, and if you live within a
25 mile radius of LAX, then—begging your pardon, but—where have you been?!), where a large strip of native wetlands
bordered by the old Hughes Aircraft Company (including the hangar where the
infamous Spruce Goose was built) was developed into a mega-sized housing,
business and retail complex, now gloriously nicknamed “Silicon Beach.” Playa
Vista was the first of such wetland developments that somehow skipped through
the system and yet resulted in millions of dollars in profit for developers
along what was native land. We’ve all long gotten over the fact that it
happened, because, let’s face it: there are too many businesses that are now
benefitting the local economy, and housing prices have skyrocketed as a result
of its proximity.
But
that’s not to say that it wasn’t a blight on the city, and incensed environmentalists and residents alike that it went through. When driving East
from Lincoln on Jefferson, what was once a greenbelt is now a tunnel of high
rise buildings and construction vehicles and stoplights, and the building
continues as more and more development manages to chip away the last of what
was left of the lands that once grew wild to the south.
Concessions
were made to allow for some of the adjacent land to remain undeveloped.
Environmentalists worked hard to ensure the remaining wetlands were kept intact
and deemed protected land. West of Lincoln, both sides of Jefferson and Culver
are still native wetlands, which grow wild in the spring into a myriad of
colors and serve as a natural habitat for a variety of indigenous plant and wild
life. There is a small pocket condominium development within those lands that
was built in the late 1960s, on the streets La Villa Marina and Fiji, which
border Lincoln, Mindanao, the 90 and “Area C”, or the Ballona Wetland Preserve.
I
have called La Villa Marina home for over 10 years. We live in harmony with the
lands around us, recognizing the necessity of having an adjacent natural
habitat as our neighbor. I have raised my children here; they played baseball
(and one still does) at the adjoining Culver Marina Little League, they have
ridden bikes and scooters on the many pathways that border the Los Angeles
River, they run along the jetty and within the area, and thus have grown up in
the neighborhood respecting and appreciating the wetlands that surround us. Our
little development is bordered on one side by a strip of undeveloped land along
the 90 south of Mindanao that, for anyone driving by, appears to be more
wetlands. After all, the Ballona Wetlands Preserve is our southern neighbor,
and the route to Culver along the frontage road is bordered by the same plant
life.
Imagine
our surprise when, a few years ago, we learned that the little strip wasn’t
more of the protected land at all, but rather was partially owned by the State,
while the remainder was privately owned. At first that meant little; the land
was unfenced, infrequently tended, and wildly overgrown – as often happens with
vacant lands – and the owners seemed to believe (as we had) that it was just a
continuous part of the wetlands. After all, a swale weaves through that land
that carries water and fertile ground throughout, carrying native seeds from
within the protected land back into this private land—and vice versa. There is
evidence of California Goldenrod, Mulefat and other indigenous plants growing
throughout all of it, and there are no borders outlined along this strip to
determine what is state-owned, what is privately-owned, and what is up for
grabs.
Now,
however, it matters. Private developers are looking to bulldoze two of the
parcels directly adjacent to the 90 and Mindanao and build a parking lot for
overflow storage of new cars for the Toyota of Marina del Rey Dealership. They intend
to literally pave over what has been wild land for decades, dig up indigenous
plant life and “relocate it,” chop down numerous 40 year old trees (several of
which are on our own private property while others are “on the property line”),
and build nine foot walls around that land to ensure their parking lot is
secured. No matter that our alley will become a concrete tunnel, an echo
chamber of momentous proportions, and all the beautiful foliage our villa
currently looks at removed to ensure they can fit all 308 parking spots in as
designed.
This
land is privately-owned. No one is arguing that. But the fact that the City
Planning Office was willing and ready to approve this without going through the
proper channels was alarming. There was no Coastal Commission notification.
There was no traffic impact study. Neighbors were left in the dark while the
landowners dealt with a select few residents on the neighborhood Board who
largely had no say or immediate personal impact as a result of what this
dealership was proposing. And, worst of all, the Ballona Wetlands Preserve, the
Sierra Club, and several other environmental agencies who are supposed to be
notified of any pending developments near their protected lands, were not.
Thankfully a concerned neighbor alerted them the day before a City hearing,
which allowed them to take notice and not a moment too soon.
Developers
argue that these two plots of land are not a part of the Wetlands, that they
may be adjacent to them but that they remain independent of the Preserve. While
that is true in the most legal sense, environmentally that is a very incorrect
statement. Wetlands do not just “start and stop” – they ebb and flow, as
evidenced by the swale that is a part of the parcels and connects through to
both the State owned land as well as the Preserve lands themselves. They carry
indigenous seeds to adjoining lands, and are home to many native species as a
result.
Beyond
the environmental impact, there are other use concerns, such as the traffic
impact—which the City was told was minimal. However, these lands are adjacent
to one of the busiest intersections in our community, and a bottleneck of
traffic already exits. To add a parking lot with ingress/egress right at the
intersection of Mindanao and the 90 will undoubtedly put even more strain on
our consistently jammed streets, streets where insensitive drivers already
regularly block the intersection, prohibiting resident access into/exit out of
our cul-de-sac. It also will hinder access for emergency vehicles, which are
already having a hard time getting through the intersections and into/out of
the nearby hospital as it is.
Another
concern is the financial impact. Real estate agents concur that the villas that
face the proposed parking lot will notice a 5-10% detriment to their property
values. Additionally, during construction the added dust, noise and smell of
diesel and heavy vehicles will further decrease sales prices of those directly
adjacent to the development. Our own private property will be infringed upon,
garage access severely limited, and cement driveways damaged. The long-term impact
is obvious, but still we are told “it will be so much better when it’s done.”
Proponents
of the project say it will keep us more secure, given the increase of homeless
we’ve seen within our property limits. They claim building a parking lot on the
land will displace those already living within that land and cause them to go
elsewhere. This is a groundless claim. Had the landowners policed the land on a
regular basis, the homeless population would not have found a haven within this
pocket to begin with. Additionally, the homeless by and large leave residents
alone. They panhandle, they rummage through our trash, but they have rarely
openly threatened anyone. Building a wall around the property will not prohibit
the homeless from simply walking a block further and coming down our ungated
alleyways and streets—access that is even more attractive to anyone with
ill-intent given the lack of visibility from a thoroughfare and dark
tunnel-like dead-end alleyways.
We
met with the landowners, although it took us fighting their City Use Permit
without notifying us up front to get their attention. We listened to them. We
asked questions, many of which they could not or would not directly answer. We
heard too much inconsistency, and the only thing that has remained a constant
is their intent to pave over what we see out our windows currently and replace
it with another asphalt jungle. We were told they’ll do it regardless, so we
either agree to a compromise—which will still result in a parking lot, the
removal of the indigenous vegetation as well as our trees and a wall
surrounding the property—or they’ll simply go forward with a plan that isn’t
nearly as “esthetically pleasing” or “secure” as the one currently proposed. (By
the way, even with the alternatives presented, our Villa HOA voted unanimously
to reject the existing proposal and is determined to keep them from doing
anything further without the proper notifications, impact studies completed,
and environmental approval.)
I
am a fair-minded person. My opinions are generally founded on weighing the
facts. And I agree that the landowners have a right to try to find a use for
their private land. I would like to be a good neighbor, and find a solution
that benefits everyone. But the fact that there have been so many issues uncovered
while researching this project have made me very leery about anything these landowners might propose now or
in the future. I cannot say with any good faith that I trust them to have the
well-being of our little community at heart as they otherwise claim. After all,
they proposed to have this land rezoned without notifying property owners;
thankfully, the City was required to do so, or we would not have ever learned
about this to begin with. Even the City was astonished to hear that the neighbors
and conservationists associated with the adjoining wetlands had not been
appropriately notified, making everyone feel very under-informed and puzzled as
to the process in general.
So
the next time you drive by the 90/Mindanao, you may want to take a second look
at this land and remember this little appeal. If you, like many others, would
like to see agriculture and wild lands stay a part of our area where we can,
then please follow our residents in opposing this development. Call your
Council members, tweet them, write them letters in opposition. Contact City
Planners, raise your voices, and be heard. This isn’t about politics; it’s
about a community, treating neighborhoods with respect and honesty, and banding
together to protect what is and should be preserved.
Joni
Mitchell’s lyrics aren’t just part of a nice little tune. Realize that they speak for us, and are literally describing what is happening within our
backyards. We are fighting to keep what we have before it’s gone.